Cambrian Mountains National Park
Rejection
Text of letter dated 17th July 1973 from the Welsh Office to the Director
of the Countryside Commission
Sir,
National Parks and Access to the Countryside Act 1949
The National Parks and Access to the Countryside Regulations 1950
The Cambrian Mountains National Park (Designation) Order 1972
I am directed by the Secretary of State to refer to your letter of 24th
October 1972 with which you submitted for his consideration the Cambrian
Mountains National Park (Designation) Order 1972 and other relevant documents.
Following the publication by the Commission in the London Gazette and
newspapers of the Notice stating the effect of the Order 43 objections
to the Order including petitions signed by a total of 108 persons and
6 representatives in favour of the confirmation of the Order were received.
Among the objectors were all five county councils involved, five of the
seven district councils and five parish councils whose areas lie within
the designated area. Objections were also received from the Country Landowners'
Association, the National Farmers' Union, the Farmers' Union of Wales,
the Council for the Protection of Rural Wales, Plaid Cymru, various branches
of those organisations and 15 individual persons. Representations in favour
of the proposal were submitted by the Youth Hostels Assocation, the Cyclists'
Touring Club, and four individual persons.
The objectors to the Order put forward the following reasons for their
opposition:-
| 1. |
It is premature to establish a new National Park before the report
of the National Parks' Committee is published. |
| 2. |
The establishment of a new National Park would further fragment
the planning services and weaken the planning authorities. |
| 3. |
The designation of the area as a National Park wiould result in
an increase in the number of visitors to the area which would be prejudicial
to the interests of farmers and landowners in the area. |
| 4. |
Greater tourist pressure would result in trespass on privately owned
land, damage to crops and interference by dogs with livestock. |
| 5. |
Designation would result in tighter planning control which would
interfere with the freedom of farmers and involve them in further
financial burdens. |
| 6. |
People living in the area would be burdened by visitors for whom
there are inadequate facilties which would have to be provided. |
| 7. |
Improved roads and the establishment of either country parks or
picnic sites at strategic points would be sufficiently adequate as
an alternative to a new National Park. |
| 8. |
A new Park should not be established until the Commission has adequate
staff in Wales to ensure the effective co-operation of local authorities. |
| 9. |
The area should be designated as an Area of Outstanding Natural
Beauty rather than a National Park. |
The Secretary of State has carefully considered the Commission's statement
in support of confirmation of the Order and accepts that the area involved
is an extensive tract of relatively wild country; which by reason of its
natural beauty and the opportunity it might afford for open air recreation
possibly fulfils the requirements for a National Park. He also agrees
that public demand for access to such areas is growing but bearing in
mind that roughly 20% of the land area of Wales has already been included
in designated National Parks he is not convinced that it would be appropriate
to establish yet another Park in Wales at the present time.
In coming to this conclusion he has been influenced by the very strong
and widespread opposition to the Order particularly on the part of the
local authorities involved.
Having regard to both the number and substance of the objections received
the Secretary of State is satisfied that the case against confirmation
of the Order is sufficiently strong to warrant his dispensing with holding
a public local inquiry and that in the light of the evidence already submitted
he should refuse to confirm the Order. He has therefore decided not to
confirm the Order.
He feels, however, that notwithstanding this decision positive action
may need to be taken to provide facilties in certain parts of the proposed
National Park area to meet possible future pressures. To this end he proposes
to arrange for his officials to have talks with officials and representatives
of the Countryside Commission, the Forestry Commission and the local authorities
concerned about the possible development of country parks, car parks,
picnic sites and other amenities in the area concerned.
I am, Sir,
Your obedient Servant
I.S. Dewar |
